Allowed

Harihar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2017CR. MISC./45323/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Sections 147, 148, 149, 124(A), 386 IPC, Arms Act, and CrPC, the court released the petitioner upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding address change, pending cases, and appearance in court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount subject to undertaking conditions regarding address, other cases, and appearance.

Harihar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45323 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2017 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== Harihar Yadav Son of Kailash Yadav Resident of village- Sandha, P.S.Hussainganj, District- Palamu (Jharkhand) ... .... Petitioner Versus

¶4

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 20-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 124(A) and 386 IPC and 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act and 17 Cr.L.A Act. Police, on secret information, detained and searched five persons and recovered Rs. 20,000/- and a mobile phone from the possession of the petitioner.

¶8

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case as no incriminating was recovered from him for which he is already in custody since 17.7.2017. Prior to the instant case, no case is pending against him.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner as mentioned above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangbad in Deo Police Station Case No. 69 of 2017, on the following conditions:-

¶10

(a) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with him. The bailor will also undertake to inform

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45323 of 2017 (2) dt.20-09-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶14

(b) The affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case, and if he is, he shall not be released on bail.

¶15

(c) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter, the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

¶16

(d) The petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

¶17

(e) The petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶18

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶19

Shashi.

¶20

U T

Harihar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harihar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Swarnkar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Makbul Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmaraj and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ganga Roy @ Gangu Vs The State Of Bihar

Diwakar @ Mantu Rai @ Mantu Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Kullu Sah @ Satya Narayan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar