Counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Miscellaneous application. The Hon'ble Court granted the permission, and the application was dismissed as withdrawn in this oral order.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; Application rejected as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45295 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -BUXAR MUFFSIL District- BUXAR
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s
The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 19-09-2017 Counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant application. Permission is accorded. The application is rejected as withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Prakash/-
U T
Dharmaraj, Vicki Both Sons
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
