Allowed

Munni Khatoon @ Najamun Nisha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Sept 2017CR. MISC./45174/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to an 80-year-old petitioner accused of abducting and trafficking a woman under IPC sections 363, 366A, 376, and 120B/34. The order imposed standard conditions including sureties, genealogy affidavit, and undertakings regarding onward movement and trial attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to specific undertakings and conditions.

Munni Khatoon @ Najamun Nisha Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45174 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -216 Year- 2017 Thana -BAJPATTI District- SITAMARHI

¶3

====================================================== Munni Khatoon @ Najamun Nisha, Wife of Late Md. Dawood, R/o Village- Muraul, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Sri Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Smt. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 19-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶5

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence under sections 363, 366A, 376 and 120B/34 IPC. Informant alleges that the petitioner took her to Mumbai on allurement of marrying her with her (petitioner’s) grand son.

¶6

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the police after investigation found the case to be true under sections 498A and 363 IPC. Further, the informant, aged about 22 years, had gone to Mumbai on her own sweet will where she performed marriage but did not sign the Talaknama due to some difference with her husband. He further submits that the petitioner is 80 years old lady and is languishing in custody since 26.7.2017 and prior to the lodging of this case, no other case is pending against her.

¶7

In view of the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner as mentioned above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Pupari at Sitamarhi in Bajpatti Police Station Case No. 216 of 2017 on the

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45174 of 2017 (2) dt.19-09-2017

¶9

2/2

¶10

following conditions:-

¶11

(a) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with her. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶12

(b) The affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case, and if she is, she shall not be released on bail.

¶13

(c) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he/she will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter, the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.

¶14

(d) The petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.

¶15

(e) The petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶16

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶17

Shashi.

¶18

U T

Munni Khatoon @ Najamun Nisha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munni Khatoon @ Najamun Nisha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Laltu Kumar @ Randhir Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jitendra Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotu Swarnkar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Makbul Vs The State Of Bihar

Dharmaraj and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar