Single-judge oral order granting leave to the petitioners to withdraw the application to agitate issues at the charge-faming stage with the application being dismissed.
Leave is granted to withdraw the application; the application is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44770 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Mohan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad , APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 11-05-2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present application in order to agitate all the points available to the petitioners at the stage of framing of charge.
Leave is granted.
The application is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the present criminal miscellaneous application should be granted to agitate points at the stage of framing of charges.
Raj Narain Sharma
Avinash Kumar Sharma
Satyendra Sharma
Suraj Narain Prasad
Deo Nandan Sharma
The State Of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
