The Patna High Court dismissed a writ application seeking directions to implement a Labour Court award, holding that extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot be used for executing orders of a Labour Tribunal.
Application dismissed. No direction issued to respondent no. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1829 of 2014
======================================================
Anil Kumar Singh Son of Sri Din Dayal Singh Resident Of VillageRampur, P.O. Pratappur, Via- Awatarnagar, District- Saran (Chapra)
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Ray, Advocate Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, AC to GP====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 10-05-2017 By way of the present writ application, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to respondent no. 2 to implement the award passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Patna in Reference Case No. 7 of 1992 dated 08.01.1999.
In the opinion of this Court, the writ application is thoroughly misconceived. The extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot be used for executing the orders passed by a Labour Tribunal. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether extraordinary writ jurisdiction is available to execute orders passed by a Labour Tribunal.
Anil Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Administrator, Bihar State Industrial Co-Operative Federation Ltd.
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
