Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case alleging chargeable offences including murder. The court rejected the application, noting the informant was not an eyewitness and the petitioner's version was unsupported.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail was rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42692 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -104 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR
====================================================== 1. Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto S/o Mohan Mahto Resident of Village- Suleman Chhapra, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
- The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
- 3 09-11-2017 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sahebganj P.S. case No. 104 of 2017 for the offences punishable under Section 302, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on anticipatory bail in the PS.Case No.104 of 2017.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manoj Mahto @ Manoj Kumar Mahto
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Prabhat Kumar Jha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court