Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petition. The court granted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42647 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2005 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikram Singh, Adv. Dr. Kislay, Adv. For the Opposite Party No.1: Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey (APP) For the Opposite Party No.2: Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
4 06-12-2017 The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks
permission to withdraw the present petition.
The prayer is allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
BTiwary/-
U T
Praduman Pathak
Babu Lal Pathak
Sumitra Kunwer
The State of Bihar
Baban Pandey
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
