The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving the recovery of Mahua wine, reiterating claims of false implication and lack of recovery at the petitioner's residence. Bail was granted subject to specific conditions.
Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4134 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -258 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictPURNIA
====================================================== Rajiv Uraon, son of Late Sukru Uraon, resident of Village- Basantpur, P.S.Sadar, District- Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2 06-02-2017
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4134 of 2017 (2) dt.06-02-2017
2/2
petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, in connection with Case CI No. 258 of 2016 on the following conditions -
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Amin/Ibrar
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail for offences under Sections 47(A) and 53(B) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajiv Uraon
State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
