Allowed

Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2017CR. MISC./39533/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous application arising from a kidnapping case, the Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail. The court noted the victim's statement indicated elopement rather than kidnapping. Bail was granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to enlarge petitioner on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Md. Muslim Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39533 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -143 Year- 2017 Thana -SIKTI District- ARRARIA

¶4

====================================================== Md. Muslim, son of Late Latifur Rahman, resident of village Salguri Parariya, P.S. Sikty, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

02 19-08-2017

¶7

The petitioner seeks bail in Sikty P.S. Case No. 143 of 2007 registered under Section 363 & 366 A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with three other accused persons are said to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant from his house. They have also taken away silver, gold and cash of Rs.75,000.00.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no concern with the said occurrence. Nothing incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession. The victim in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated that she had eloped with Gulam Rasul out of her sweet will and performed marriage with him and

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39533 of 2017 (02) dt.19-08-2017

¶11

-2-

¶12

no one had kidnapped her. The petitioner has been languishing in custody since 06.06.2017.

¶13

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Araria in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No.143 of 2017.

¶14

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶15

Trivedi/-

¶16

U T

Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radhe Yadav @ Raj Kishore Yadav and Anr. Vs Geeta Devi and Ors.

Ram Uttim Paswan @ Terenam Vs The State Of Bihar

Branch Manager United India in Vs Chameli Devi and Ors.

Brahamdeo Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja Hussain Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar