Allowed

Sitan Yadav @ Sikan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2017CR. MISC./39234/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case under the NDPS Act. The court noted that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, nothing was recovered from his possession, no prior case was pending, and the charge sheet had been submitted. Bail was fixed at Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of like amount to the Sessions Judge, Gaya.

Sitan Yadav @ Sikan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39234 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39234 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -316 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA

¶4

====================================================== Sitan Yadav @ Sikan Yadav

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶6

2 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶7

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offence under

¶8

sections 15, 18 and 20 of the NDPS Act.

¶9

The case of the informant, a police officer, is that pursuant to some information, police party searched a parked truck and recovered a plastic packet from its cabin containing Doda powder. On the disclosure of Driver and Khalasi of the vehicle, petitioner was arrested on chase as a person who allegedly sold the narcotic substance to the said two persons.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot nor anything was recovered from his possession. Further, no case is pending against him prior to this case and he is in custody since 30.5.2017. Learned counsel also submits that the charge sheet

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39234 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017

¶12

has also been submitted in the case.

¶13

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, as mentioned above, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Gaya (NDPS Act) in Barachatty Police station Case No. 316 of 2017.

¶14

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶15

Shashi.

¶16

U T

Sitan Yadav @ Sikan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sitan Yadav @ Sikan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yadunandan Prasad Yadav and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sunita Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Basir and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sushil Kumar Singh @ Sushil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kunal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar