The High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application as infructuous due to the passage of time.
The criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38568 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -305 Year- 2014 Thana -DEEPNAGAR District- NALANDA
(BIHARSHARIFF)
======================================================
All sons of Suresh Prasad.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Verma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Dayal, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 04-07-2017 It is stated by Mr. Umesh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners that due to passage of time, the application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Sanjeet/U T
Suresh Prasad & Ors.
State of Bihar & Jyoti Kumari
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
