This was an oral order where the High Court at Patna, through a single judge, dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application held to be infructuous due to the lapse of time by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14553 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -128 Year- 2015 Thana -GHANSHYAMPUR District- DARBHANGA
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 04-07-2017 It is stated by Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, learned counsel for the petitioners that due to passage of time, the application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application has become infructuous due to the passage of time.
Sindhu Devi, Tunni Devi, Diwakar Singh
The State of Bihar, Nitu Devi
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
