Allowed

Julu Rai @ Jullu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Aug 2017CR. MISC./38286/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a larceny and recovery of weapons case. The court noted lack of incriminating evidence against the petitioner and absence of criminal antecedents, ordering release upon furnishing a bond and sponsorships.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Julu Rai @ Jullu Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38286 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2017 Thana -PHENHARA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Julu Rai @ Jullu Kumar Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Rai, R/o Village- Chakardhe, P.S.- Piprakothi, District- East Champaran.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER

¶5

02 16-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶6

The petitioner seeks bail in Fenhara P.S. Case No.25 of 2017 registered under Section 379, 411, 413, 414, 465, 468, 471 and 474/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 (1-b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶7

As per the prosecution case, accused Arun Kumar alias Arun Sahani has been apprehended by the police with a loaded country made pistol who disclosed the name of the petitioner as his accomplice in other cases of looting motorcycle.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner rather the stolen motorcycle was recovered from near the house of Madan

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38286 of 2017 (02) dt.16-08-2017

¶10

-2-

¶11

Mukhiya. There is nothing on record indicating the complicity of the petitioner in the occurrence barring the confessional statement of co-accused, Arun Kumar which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He has been languishing in custody since 04.05.2017,

¶12

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 12^th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Fenhara P.S. Case No.25 of 2017.

¶13

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J)

¶14

Trivedi/-

¶15

U T

Julu Rai @ Jullu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Julu Rai @ Jullu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bulaki Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Mundrika Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Thakur Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Samlesh Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar