Allowed

Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jul 2017CR. MISC./32647/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving liquor smuggling, directing the granting of regular bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks on furnishing sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail; directed to be enlarged on regular bail within four weeks upon surrender furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties.

Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32647 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -359 Year- 2016 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN

¶3

====================================================== Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat, s/o Dinesh Nat @ Dineshwar Nat, r/o vill-Bajit Bhorahan, PS- Marhowrah, Dist-Saran at Chapra

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Marhowrah PS case no. 359 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 188, 308 of Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A), 54 of Bihar Excise Act.

¶9

The informant raided an open field and recovered 50 liters of country made mahua liquor. The informant alleged that petitioner was preparing country made liquor and selling the same.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the place.

¶11

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32647 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017

¶13

2/2

¶14

the petitioner.

¶15

Accordingly, let the abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhowrah PS case no. 359 of 2016 subject to the conditions enumerated under Section 438(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J.)

¶17

rinkee/-

¶18

U T

Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharamvir Kumar Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chandra Shekhar Jha and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pramila Devi and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Taukir Khan @ Man Khan @ Taukir Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Ashif Vs The State Of Bihar