Allowed

Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC13 Jul 2017CR. MISC./32602/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case involving sections 420, 465, and 468 of the IPC. The court recorded satisfaction despite pending civil title disputes.

What did the court decide?

Order granting anticipatory bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Sitamarhi.

Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu Vs State Of Bihar… — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32602 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -132 Year- 2016 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI

¶3

====================================================== 1. Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu, son of Late Ganesh Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Ganeshpur Babhangama, P.S.- Riga, DistrictSitamarhi at present residing at Krishna Nagar North side from Railway West Gumti No.1 P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Ramendra Prasad Singh, son of Late Ganesh Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Ganeshpur Babhangama, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Labh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. C1/132 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465 and 468 of the I.P.C.

¶14

The case of the complainant is that the petitioner had sold the land which he had received by way of partition. It has been further alleged that when the informant had protested, the petitioner assaulted him.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a title suit is pending for the aforesaid land. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case an has no criminal

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32602 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017

¶17

2/2

¶18

antecedent.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct deem it fit and appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Accordingly, let the abovenamed petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Sitamarhi, in connection with Complaint Case No. C1/132 of 2016 subject to the conditions enumerated under Section 438 (2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

khushbu/-

¶23

U T

Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birendra Prasad Singh @ Bachanu Babu v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharamvir Kumar Ranjan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Chandra Shekhar Jha and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pramila Devi and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Taukir Khan @ Man Khan @ Taukir Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhim Bali Nat @ Shim Bali Nat @ Bhil Bali Nat @ Shiv Bali Nat Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Ashif Vs The State Of Bihar