Allowed

Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2017CR. MISC./32263/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single judge order granting regular bail to the petitioner after the trial had remained unconcluded for over a year following a previous rejection. Bail was granted subject to strict conditions regarding bailors, future conduct, and attendance in court proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with conditions: one close relative as surety, liberty to prosecute for similar offenses, and mandatory court attendance.

Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32263 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -8 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAURADANO DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah, Son of Jagarnath Sah, Resident of VillagePipra, P.S.- Darpa Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, APP

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 09-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶8

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.314 of 2016, arising out of Chhauradano P.S. Case No.8 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶9

Earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.7339 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 11.04.2016 rejected the bail application of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within one year.

¶10

Considered the fact one year has already been

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32263 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

elapsed but the trial is not concluded, let the petitioner-Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 12^th A.D.J, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Sessions Trial No.314 of 2016, arising out of Chhauradano P.S. Case No.8 of 2015 subject to the conditions that:-

¶14

(i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/ wife/son of the petitioner;

¶15

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

¶16

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶17

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶18

pawan/-

¶19

Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s New Revival Homeo Pharmacy Proprietor Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

M/s Arenco Catering Vs The East Central Railway Through The Chief General Manager and Ors.

Ram Balak Kumar Vs The Managing Director, Bihar State Warehousing Corporation and Ors.

Gangadhar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar