Dismissed

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2017CR. MISC./24142/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a murder and kidnapping case where prosecution concluded evidence. Court denied bail, relying on earlier 2016 order directing speedy trial, and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within three months pending defense cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed. Trial court directed to conclude within three months upon defense cooperation.

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav Vs The State Of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24142 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2015 Thana -BANGAON District- SAHARSA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav, Son of Rajendra Yadav, Resident of Village- Mahartha, Police Station- Saharsa Sadar, District- Saharsa.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP For the Informant : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶6

3 09-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶7

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.34 of 2016, arising out of Bangaon P.S. Case No.93 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 302, 201 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal code.

¶8

Earlier, the petitioner has moved before this Court for bail in Criminal Miscellaneous No.53579 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 15.02.2017 rejected the bail application of the petitioner and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within two months.

¶9

It appears from the report of the Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Saharsa, that the prosecution has closed his

¶10

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24142 of 2017 (3) dt.09-08-2017

¶11

2/2

¶12

evidence.

¶13

In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Now, it is the turn of the defence as the conclusion of the trial depends upon co-operation extended by the defence. If the defence extends the co-operation, in such circumstance, the Court below will conclude the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶14

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶15

pawan/-

¶16

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rabindra Yadav @ Rabinder Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s New Revival Homeo Pharmacy Proprietor Jitendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Satish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

M/s Arenco Catering Vs The East Central Railway Through The Chief General Manager and Ors.

Ram Balak Kumar Vs The Managing Director, Bihar State Warehousing Corporation and Ors.

Gangadhar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Munchun Sah @ Manjan Sah Vs The State Of Bihar