Allowed

Ajay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jul 2017CR. MISC./31330/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge oral order granting regular bail to the petitioner in a case under Section 394 IPC. The petitioner was released subject to furnishing bail bonds and standard conditions regarding witness tampering and court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing ₹25,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions of reporting to the court and not tampering with evidence.

Ajay Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31330 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2017 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Kumar Yadav Son of Sheo Kumar Yadav, Resident of VillageTardih Gangra, Police Station Gidhour, District Jamui.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶7

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Vinod Shankar Modi

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 01 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner’s name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and uptil now no Test Identification Parade has been conducted and he has been

¶11

in judicial custody since 22.05.2017.

¶12

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶13

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner’s name transpired on this case only on the basis of

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31330 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017

¶15

2/3

¶16

confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 01 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:-

¶17

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

¶18

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

¶20

It is also made clear that if the petitioner again found

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31330 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017

¶22

3/3

¶23

involved in any of such offence, in future, his bail bonds will be

¶24

cancelled.

¶25

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶26

sunil/-

¶27

U T

Ajay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikee Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Abbas Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sabir @ Sabir Vs The State Of Bihar

Dablu Kumar Soni @ Pintu Sonar @ Dablu Kumosar Vs The State Of Bihar