Allowed

Vikee Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2017CR. MISC./29909/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous application granted regular bail to the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for smuggling wine. The court fixed a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and imposed standard conditions to prevent witness tampering and ensure attendance in trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Vikee Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29909 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2017 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikee Singh son of Rajendra Singh Resident of Village - Rupawel, P.S. - Khaira, District - Jamui.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 12-07-2017 Heard the parties.

¶10

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kawakole P.S.Case No.26 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶11

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was assisting the other accused persons in smuggling of the wine and thereafter a huge quantity of wine has been recovered from one Tata Sumo vehicle.

¶12

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that nothing has been recovered from his possessions. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for about four months.

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29909 of 2017 (3) dt.12-07-2017

¶14

2/2

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶16

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of A.C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Kawakole P.S.Case No.26 of 2017.

¶17

With following conditions :

¶18

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

¶19

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

¶20

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

¶21

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

¶22

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

chn/-

¶24

U T

Vikee Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikee Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Kumar Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Sah @ Sukru Vs The State Of Bihar

Yogendra Chaudhary @ Gonga Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Abbas Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Barnwal Vs The State Of Bihar