Allowed

Dilip Kumar @ Dablo @ Bablu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2017CR. MISC./30790/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, charged with robbery under Section 392 IPC in Tandawa P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, applied for regular bail while in custody since May 1, 2017. The High Court allowed bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Aurangabad.

Dilip Kumar @ Dablo @ Bablu Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30790 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -TANDWA District- AURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dablo @ Bablu Son of Baijnath Ram, Resident of VillageChankar Kasturi, P.S.- Hussainabad, District- Palamu (Jharkhand).

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 07-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶6

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Tandawa P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

The case of the prosecution in short is that when the informant was going to his house on a bike and when he arrived near Kanchan Bandh, two unknown miscreants stopped him and the said persons are said to have taken away the bike of the informant on the point of pistol. The police is said to have arrived at the place of occurrence and the said bike was recovered from the possession of other accused person.

¶8

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has a clean antecedent and is in custody since 01.05.2017.

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30790 of 2017 (2) dt.07-07-2017

¶10

2/2

¶11

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

¶12

case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶13

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to

¶14

be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Tandawa P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017.

¶15

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶16

BTiwary/-

¶17

U T

Dilip Kumar @ Dablo @ Bablu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar @ Dablo @ Bablu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Swaroop Rajwanshi @ Rupa Rajwanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sundari Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalita Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Vs The State Of Bihar