Dismissed

Rampari Devi and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 Jul 2017CR. MISC./30665/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge dismissed an application filed under the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashing of the Magistrate's order taking cognizance in a case involving obstruction of public servants, holding the application was misconceived despite a pending civil dispute.

What did the court decide?

Application for quashing the order dated 02.12.2013 is dismissed as misconduct.

Rampari Devi and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No 30665 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -155 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-

¶3

PATNA

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Rampari Devi w/o Late Ram Briksh Prasad Yadav

¶6

Arbind Kumar @ Arbind Yadav S/o Late Ram Briksh Yadav @ Ram Briksh Prasad Yadav

¶7

Ravi Shankar Prasad S/o Late Suresh Prasad

¶8

Narayan Prasad S/o Late Lochan Pandit All are residents of Mohalla - Saidpura, P.S. Khagaul, District - Patna

¶9

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Bihar

¶12

Darbari Choudhary, Police Inspector - cum - Officer Incharge, Khagaul Police Station, District Patna

¶13

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶14

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶15

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

¶16

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶17

Date: 19-07-2017

¶18

The instant application has been filed for quashing the order dated 02.12.2013 passed in Case No 155 (C-2) of 2013 whereby the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 186 and 189 of Indian Penal Code, Section 34 of Police Act, 1861 and Section 72 of Bihar Police Act, 2007.

¶19

2 From perusal of the report (Annexure 1), it is apparent that the ingredients of the offence are made out and there is sufficient material for forming a prima facie opinion by the Magistrate for taking cognizance. The impugned order, therefore, cannot be faulted.

¶20

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30665 of 2014 dt.19-07-2017

¶21

2/2

¶22

3 Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the matter is essentially a civil dispute with relation to the land and Title Suit No 251 of 2012 is pending between the parties.

¶23

4 The aforesaid submission is noted only to be rejected because this case has been lodged at the instance of the police and, as already noted above, the ingredients of the offence are to be found in the report.

¶24

5 This application is misconceived and is, accordingly,

¶25

dismissed.

¶26

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶27

M.E.H. /-

¶28

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAVDATE	NA
UploadingDate	20.07.2017
Transmission Date	20.07.2017

Rampari Devi and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampari Devi and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nazir Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Zainab Khatoon and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pratima Devi @ Pratima Gupta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Iblur Hasan @ Md. Iblur Hassan Vs The State Of Bihar