Allowed

Prasant Kumar Bharti @ Prasant Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2017CR. MISC./30007/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act case where the petitioner was apprehended but nothing was recovered from his possession unlike a co-accused, the court granted bail despite his criminal antecedents, directing furnishing of a bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Prasant Kumar Bharti @ Prasant Kumar Giri Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30007 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2017 Thana -NARKATIYAGANJ RAIL P.S. DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRASANT KUMAR BHARTI @ PRASANT KUMAR GIRI Son of Om Prakash Bharti, resident of Village/ Mohalla- Sagar Pokhara Bettiah, P.S.Bettiah Town, District- West Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Adya Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Bhushan

¶10

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 06-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

This is a case registered under Sections 18, 22, 27 and 27(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act in connection with Narkatiyaganj Rail P.S. Case No. 2/2017.

¶14

It has been submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that he along with two other accused persons have been apprehended from the train. The allegation in the F.I.R. is that from possession of other apprehended person, namely, Avinash Kumar Giri, small sachet of Smack has been recovered. On perusal of the F.I.R., it is obvious that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. His name surfaced

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30007 of 2017 (2) dt.06-07-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

in this case in his confessional statement and though he has a criminal antecedent which has been mentioned in paragraph 3 of the petition. He has been remanded in this case. He is in custody since 19.01.2017.

¶18

Considering the above submissions, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 3^rd Additional District & Sessions Judge Bettiah (West champaran) in connection with Narkatiyaganj Rail P.S. Case No. 2/2017.

¶19

(Madhuresh Prasad, .)

¶20

Rakhi

¶21

U T

Prasant Kumar Bharti @ Prasant Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prasant Kumar Bharti @ Prasant Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Shambhu Sharan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashutosh Kumar and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramdeo Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jaki Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarfuddin Vs The State Of Bihar

Subelal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar