Allowed

Noor Afsa @ Fauzia v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC23 Feb 2017CR. MISC./2555/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allowed an application for transfer of a Section 125 maintenance case from Purnea to Sitamarhi Family Court, as it was a fit case given the petitioner's residence and the uncontroverted plea of convenience.

What did the court decide?

Maintenance Case No. M152/2014 transferred from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sitamarhi.

Noor Afsa @ Fauzia Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2555 of 2017

¶2

====================================================== 1. Noor Afsa @ Fauzia, Wife of Salim Jawed, Daughter of Hasnain Alam, Resident of Vill.- Bhavdeopur, Ward No. 15, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar.

¶6

Salim Jawed @ Kussu, S/o Jawed Hushtaque @ Bhola, Resident of Village- Bhavdeopur (Goat), Ward No.- 15, Chamada Godam, P.S. + District- Sitamarhi.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

This application has been filed seeking transfer of Maintenance Case No. M152/2014, pending in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sitamarhi, where the petitioner is presently residing.

¶12

The Opposite party No.2 is the husband of the petitioner. It appears from the pleadings in the present application that at least three cases between the petitioner and the Opposite party No.2 arising out of matrimonial dispute are pending in Courts of Sitamarhi. It is her plea that it is highly inconvenient for her to pursue the maintenance case at Purnea, where she had lived for a

¶13

¶14

very short period, during which maintenance case was filed by her.

¶15

Notices were issued to Opposite Party No.2. Despite valid service of notice, Opposite party No.2 has not entered appearance. Thus, the averments made in the present application to the extent they relate to transfer of case have remained uncontroverted. I find it to be a fit case for exercise of power under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code ), by transferring the Maintenance Case No. M152/2014 filed under Section 125 of the Code.

¶16

Accordingly, let Maintenance Case No. M152/2014 be transferred from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Purnea to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Sitamarhi.

¶17

This application is allowed.

¶18

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶19

ArunKumar/-

¶20

Noor Afsa @ Fauzia v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noor Afsa @ Fauzia v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shipul Kumar @ Shipul Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Randhir Dubey Vs Arbind Kumar Singh and Ors.

Harendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Mr. R.k.mahajan The Petitioner The Principal Secretary Education Departm

Diwakar Kumar @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar Choudhary Vs Nitu Kumari and Anr.

Ramjanam Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar