Allowed

Jai Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Aug 2017CR. MISC./22582/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged possession of Nepali soufi spirits. The petitioner was to furnish a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and adhere to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each meeting specified conditions.

Jai Kishore Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22582 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -140 Year- 2016 Thana -KUNDWACHAINPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jai Kishore Prasad Son of Rajendra Mahto Resident oif Village- Laukha, Koraiya, P.S. Ghorashan, District- East Champaran.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

4 08-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S.Case No.140 of 2016 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

¶8

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 08 ltrs. of nepali soufi.

¶9

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about seven months.

¶10

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶11

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

¶12

circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22582 of 2017 (4) dt.08-08-2017

¶14

2/2

¶15

enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sikrahna at Dhaka in

¶16

connection with Kundwa – Chainpur P.S.Case no.140 of 2016.

¶17

With following conditions :

¶18

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

¶19

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

¶22

U T

Jai Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through C. B. I.

Lalan Bhuiya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Laddu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Shrivastav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Awinash Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Khanahaiya Kumar Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar