Allowed

Jabbar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2017CR. MISC./21929/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The court noted a discrepancy in the victim's age and relied on her statement denying kidnapping, finding the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Bail is granted subject to furnishing a bond and complying with Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, to be produced within four weeks.

Jabbar Alam Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21929 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2016 Thana -DARPA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== Jabbar Alam, S/o Sekh Jallaluddin @ Sk. Jalaluddin @ Akaloo, Resident of Village- Baikunthwa, P.S. Darpa, District East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ajay Kumar-1 (APP)

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 19-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel representing the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A), 370, 506/34of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegedly, Ebrina Khatoon the minor daughter of the informant was kidnapped by the petitioner and others, as from earlier the petitioner used to teach her.

¶14

Submission is of false implication and that the victim is major one, her statement has been recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that she has married with the petitioner out of her own sweet will and consent, she has denied

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21929 of 2017 (2) dt.19-06-2017

¶16

2/2

¶17

regarding her kidnapping and, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

¶18

The learned A.P.P. submits that in the F.I.R. the age of the victim is mentioned as 11 years but victim has stated her age 20 years and the court has assessed her age 18-19 years.

¶19

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.)

¶21

Rajiv/-

¶22

U T

Jabbar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jabbar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Babu Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hirday Rajak and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Amarjeet Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Manohar Mandal @ Ram Manohar Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar