Allowed

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Bihar, Patna

Patna HC26 Apr 2017CR. MISC./18775/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court declined a bail application initially argued by counsel but ultimately directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar.

Ramesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Bihar, Patna — Corruption | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18775 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2017 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== Ramesh Kumar, Son of Late Rampadarath Ojha, Resident of VillageKhabra, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur, at present Head Clerk, P.H.C., Mushahari, P.S.- Mushahari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Vigilance Bihar, Patna

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma (L.O.,Inc.,Vigi.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 26-04-2017 Heard both sides.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in Vigilance P.S. Case No. 09 of 2017 registered under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act corresponding to Special Case No. 06 of 2017.

¶11

One Chandrashekhar Kumar complained that the petitioner demanded Rs. 10,000/- for payment of the retiral benefits after the death of Punam Kumari.

¶12

Leanred counsel for the petitioner submits that Lal Babu Singh is the husband of the deceased Punam Kumari. The complaint was made by Chandrashekhar kumar on 31.01.2017, but before that day, more than Rupees 11 lakhs has been credited into the account of Lal Babu Singh, the husband of the deceased

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18775 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017

¶14

2/2

¶15

Punam Kumari. The petitioner is in jail since 31.01.2017. Chargesheet has already been submitted.

¶16

Learned counsel for the vigilance vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. It appears that the petitioner has already remained in jail for three months for recovery of Rs. 10,000/- from his possession. It is alleged to have taken by the petitioner for payment of retiral benefits after the death of Punam Kumari.

¶17

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Vigilance, North Bihar, Muzaffarpur in connection with Special Case No. 06 of 2017 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No. 09 of 2017.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

Mishra/-

¶20

U T

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurav Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Azadi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Basant Kumar Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Indal Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Karu Paswan @ Karu Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar