Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application to argue points later during the framing of charges stage. The High Court granted leave and disposed of the application.
Leave granted to withdraw the application to argue points at the stage of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18546 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1807 Year- 2011 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District-
VAISHALI(HAJIPUR)
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 17-07-2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present application in order to raise all the points available to the petitioners at the stage of framing of charge.
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U T
Rakesh Agrawal
Bijay Kumar Loyalka
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Rai
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
