Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a miscellaneous application to frame issues at a later stage; the High Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application.
Leave granted to withdraw the application to raise points at the stage of framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12019 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2015 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 14-07-2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present application in order to raise all the points available to the petitioners at the stage of framing of charge.
Leave is granted.
The application is disposed of.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U T
Bharat Pandey
Urmila Devi
Amar Nath Pandey
Rajesh Kumar Pandey
Kumud Devi
The State of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
