Dismissed

Baiju Mahto and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC3 Jul 2017CR. MISC./18425/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a quashing petition challenging an order taking cognizance of offences under Sections 323, 354, and 34 IPC and SC/ST Act. The court held that allegations of falsity could not be appreciated at this stage as the police investigation had substantiated the case.

What did the court decide?

Prayer to set aside the order taking cognizance dated 29.10.2012 is dismissed.

Baiju Mahto and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18425 of 2014

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -70 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHILA PS District- DARBHANGA

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Baiju Mahto Son of Siya Sharan Mahto

¶6

Uday Yadav Son of Kalewar Yadav

¶7

Nirmal Mahto Son of Yog Narayan Mahto

¶8

Mahadeo Mahto Son of Inder Mahto

¶9

Hare Ram Mahto Son of Ram Tahal Mahto All residents of village Belhi, P.S. Baheri, District Darbhanga.

¶10

.... .... Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Bihar

¶13

Bulanti Kumari D/o Late Nathuni Ram Resident of Village Belhi, P.S. Baheri, District Darbhanga.

¶14

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Nath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat(Spl.Pp)

¶18

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶20

6 03-07-2017

¶21

The petitioners challenge the order taking cognizance dated 29.10.2012, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Mahila P.S. Case No.70 of 2012 whereby cognizance has been taken of the offence under Sections 323, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code also in addition to that under Sections 3(x) and (xi) of the SC/ST Act.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant was in love relationship with another boy of the village and a Panchayati was held wherein the petitioners were Panches , therefore, this false case was lodged though the informant is now married with

¶23

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18425 of 2014 (6) dt.03-07-2017

¶24

2 / 2

¶25

that body and living together.

¶26

The allegation in brief in the First Information Report against the petitioners is that while informant was going to attend the call of nature in the night, the accused persons lifted her, took her to nearby orchard and when she raised alarm thereafter her mother reached there but in the meanwhile the accused persons removing her clothes made an attempt of rape. It is also alleged that when her mother protested then they assaulted the informant and her mother with stick.

¶27

The police after completing the investigation submitted charge sheet against the petitioners finding the case true under Sections 323, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(x) and (xi) of the SC/ST Act.

¶28

The ground raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners showing falsity of the case cannot be appreciated at this stage since there is specific allegation and during investigation, evidence has been collected by the police against the petitioners so the prayer to set aside the order taking cognizance dated 29.10.2012, passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Mahila P.S. Case No.70 of 2012 is dismissed.

¶29

Accordingly, this quashing petition stands dismissed.

¶30

S.Kumar/-

¶31

U T

Baiju Mahto and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baiju Mahto and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rashmi Onkar Nath @ Onkar Nath @ Sunil Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Ram Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Jeebachh Sada and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, and Ors.

Suresh Sah @ Suresh Lal Sah and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Mridula Sinha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar