Allowed

Jai Ram Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2017CR. MISC./28936/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner faced charges under various sections of IPC and Arms Act. Coordination Bench granted anticipatory bail to similar co-accused. Court allowed bail contingent upon arrest or surrender within four weeks upon furnishing sureties, subject to Section 438 CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bond of INR 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount if arrested or surrenders within four weeks.

Jai Ram Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28936 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2016 Thana -NARARI KALA KHURD DistrictAURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== Jai Ram Paswan Son of Viswanath Paswan, Resident of Village- Shasna, P.S.- Badem O.P., Navinagar, District- Aurangabad.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 337, 338, 307, 395, 427, 504, 506, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27, 25(1-b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

¶6

Allegation in brief is that police reached at the spot as there was some dispute between the management and labourers of NPGC/NTPC and police apprehended one person at the spot so villagers became furious and started pelleting stones over the police party and on the basis of video footage 29 persons were identified and the case was lodged.

¶7

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28936 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017

¶9

2/2

¶10

and similarly situated other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.46563 of 2016 and this petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶11

Having considered the said facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner, namely, Jai Ram Paswan be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Narari Khurd Kala P.S. Case No.16 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶12

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶13

N.H./-

¶14

U T

Jai Ram Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai Ram Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Prasad Sharma @ Surendra Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Geeta Devi @ Geeta Kumari and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rinku Kumari and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rashmi Onkar Nath @ Onkar Nath @ Sunil Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Dali Singh @ Ram Deelip Yadav @ Ram Dalip Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar