Allowed

Ashok Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Mar 2017CR. MISC./13629/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Ashok Paswan in a case under Sections 366A/34 IPC. He distinguished himself from the accused in the FIR by caste and residence, with a Circle Officer report confirming he was the wrong person.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to CrPC Section 438(2).

Ashok Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13629 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2015 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL

¶4

====================================================== 1. Ashok Paswan Son of Khushi Lal Paswan, resident of village- Kala Govindpur, P.S.- Bhimpur, District- Supaul .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, APP

¶5

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶6

7 23-03-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶7

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

According to first information report, covillagers, Md. Saddam, Rajiv Kumar and Ashok Pandit, are suspected to have induced Arti Kumari, the daughter of the informant, to go with them with intent to marry with her.

¶9

The victim-girl in her statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code stated that one Ramesh had called her. When she reached there, Ramesh and Ashok Pandit took her to different places. They established physical relation and subsequently left her on the road side. She, further, stated that Ramesh is devar of her sister. He had promised to marry. She should be married with him and Ashok Pandit should be punishied.

¶10

Submission of the petitioner is that petitioner, Ashok Paswan, is not the same person, as referred in the first information report or statement of the victim-girl

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13629 of 2016 (7) dt.23-03-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

because the petitioner is resident of altogether different village and is not a co-villager of the informant. He is Paswan by caste and not Pandit.

¶14

The Circle Officer, Chatapur, Supaul, was asked to enquiry and submit a report.

¶15

The report, dated 27.02.2017, is at flag ‘B’, reveals that Ashok Paswan is son of Khushilal Paswan and is resident of village Kalagovindpur. It is further disclosed that Ashok Paswan resides in Punjab to earn his livelihood.

¶16

Considering the entire facts, aforesaid, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 147 of 2015 to the satisfaction of Sri Jitendra Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Supaul , or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

SA/-

¶19

U √ T √

Ashok Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Anwar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Zahid and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishwa Mohan Choudhri @ Fantoosh Choudhary and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Sihashan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Samser and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar