This order grants bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for offences under the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act. The court imposed a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and required cooperation with the investigation.
Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13282 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -ROSHANGAANJ District- GAYA
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh(APP)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 22-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioner is languishing in custody for the offences punishable under Section 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.
Only a live cartridge was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Petitioner has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13282 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017
2/2
Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya/Successor Court, in connection with Raushanganj (BankeyBazar) P.S. Case No.7 of 2017, with condition that petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the Court-below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioner in this case.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Mkr./U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail in a case involving offences under Section 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Arms Act charges.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kundan Kumar Son of Mithilesh Prasad
The State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
