Allowed

Ravi Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Apr 2017CR. MISC./12742/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A bail petition arising from a case involving assault was heard. The court enlarged the petitioners on bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with mandatory conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Ravi Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12742 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12742 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -7 Year- 2017 Thana -MADANPURA District- AURANGABAD

¶4

====================================================== 1. Ravi Kumar, Son of Bishwanath Prasad, 2. Aman Kumar, Son of Kishori Prasad, Both Resident of Madanpur, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 11-04-2017 Heard both sides.

¶11

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Madanpur P. S. Case No. 07 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The informant alleged that the petitioners were hanging the sign board on the shop encroaching some portions of the shop of the informant and for that some altercation took place. The petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant. Shashi Kumar assaulted the informant with iron rod. The petitioners and others are also alleged to have assaulted the nephew of the informant. It appears that there is no specific allegation of assault

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12742 of 2017 (2) dt.11-04-2017

¶14

against the petitioners and on account of some petty dispute for

¶15

hanging the signboard, the occurrence took place.

¶16

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of

¶17

allegations made against the petitioners, the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in Madanpur P. S. Case No. 07 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

Mishra/-

¶20

U T

Ravi Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ugranath Jha and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Neeraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Saddam Vs The State Of Bihar

Anil Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Rishi @ Vinod Rishi Vs The State Of Bihar