In bail proceedings under Salaiya P.S. Case No. 31/2016 for offences under Sections 386, 120(B), 124(a) IPC and section 17 CL.A. Act, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Enlargement on bail by putting forward a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10973 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10973 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -31 Year- 2016 Thana -SALAIYA District- AURANGABAD
====================================================== YUGESH YADAV @ BUTA @ JUGESH YADAV, Son of Late Kailash Yadav, resident of Village- Raja Bigha, P.O.+P.S.- Salaiya, DistrictAurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 04-04-2017 Heard both sides.
The petitioner seeks bail in Salaiya P.S. Case No. 31/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 120(B), 124(a) of the Indian Penal Code and section 17 of the C.L.A. Act.
The S.H.O. Salaiya alleged that petitioner joined M.C.C. and he had talk with Ram Pravesh Yadav from his mobile. It is alleged that petitioner was providing place to sit the M.C.C. and also giving information about the arrival of the police. The petitioner used to collect levy for M.C.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ram Pravesh Yadav is co-villager, but the petitioner is not accused in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10973 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017
any other case. There is no material to show that the petitioner ever collected any levy from any person for M.C.C. The petitioner is in jail since 07.11.2016.
Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as stated in para 3 of the bail petition, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Salaiya P.S. Case No. 31/2016.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)
Vinita/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner entitled to bail in the moderate non-bailable offences.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Yugesh Yadav @ Buta @ Jugesh Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
