The High Court denied bail to the petitioner in an Arms Act case. Despite the absence of a monetary dispute, the petitioner had criminal antecedents and was accused in numerous other cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10952 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -289 Year- 2016 Thana -DUMRAUN District- BUXAR
====================================================== 1. MADAN SONAR @ MADAN VERMA @ MADAN KUMAR SONI, Son of Late Saryug Prasad, Resident of Village- Barki Diyan, P.S.- Krishna Brahm District- Buxar.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
The petitioner seeks bail in Dumraon (N.B.) P.S. case No. 289 of 2016 under Section 25(1-b) a/ 26/35 of the Arms Act.
The police on suspicion arrested the petitioner and one Anirudh Ram @ Chhotu. From the possession of petitioner loaded country made pistols with live cartridges and Rs. 50,000/were recovered.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that money was not subject matter of the present case and for the recovery of arms and ammunitions the petitioner is in jail since 05.11.2016 but from perusal of the records, it appears that petitioner has got criminal antecedent and he is accused in as
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10952 of 2017 (3) dt.04-04-2017
2/2
many as nine cases under different Sections of the Arms Act and under Sections 392, 395 and 396 of the IPC.
Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner in举证 of antecedents should be enlarged on bail in an Arms Act case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madan Sonar @ Madan Verma @ Madan Kumar Soni
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
