Disposed

Sukhdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Aug 2017CR. APP (SJ)/1620/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Appeal regarding bail in an SC/ST atrocity case involving IPC and Arms Act charges. The High Court directed the lower court to expedite the trial to conclude within three months, with bail release as a conditional remedy if delays persist.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court below to conclude the trial within three months from receipt of this order; otherwise, release the petitioner on bail if trial is not concluded within the stipulated period.

Sukhdeo Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1620 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2002 Thana -SC/ST District- GAYA

¶4

====================================================== Sukhdeo Yadav Son of Baleshwar Yadav, resident of Village- Mocharak, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya.

¶5

.... .... Appellant Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, A.P.P.

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

5 22-08-2017 Heard the parties.

¶8

The appellant seeks bail in SC/ST Trail No.512 of 2015 arising out of SC/ST P.S.Case No.11 of 2002 for the offence under Section 341, 342, 379, 307 of I.P.C., Section 27 of The Arms Act and Section 3(v) (x) of the Sc/ST ( Prevention of atrocities ) Act. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail.

¶9

Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that, as a matter of fact, he met with an accident. Thereafter his brother died due to which he was badly mentally disturbed. He left doing pairvi. As such, He was not aware of the date fixed in the case and hence, there were laches on the part of the appellant. He is in custody for six months.

¶10

Heard learned Special A.P.P. also.

¶11

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1620 of 2017 (5) dt.22-08-2017

¶12

2/2

¶13

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as state above, this appeal is disposed of with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and, if trial is not concluded within the stipulated date, the petitioner will be released on bail to the satisfaction of Special Judge SC/ST, Gaya in Trial No.512/15 arising out of SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Act.

¶14

AnilKrSinha/U T

¶15

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

Sukhdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukhdeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chanchal Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tinkori Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Krishna Patel @ Bhutta Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar