Dismissed

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2017CR. MISC./39232/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail for offences under IPC 394 and Arms Act 27. Court rejected bail application noting he is on duty as an employee of B.S.F. Trial court directed to conclude trial within nine months; otherwise, petitioner may renew bail prayer.

What did the court decide?

Bail rejected; trial court directed to conclude trial within nine months, with conditional renewal of bail prayer.

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39232 of 2017

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -211 Year- 2017 Thana -GOPALGANJ TOWN District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai Son of Banka Rai, R/o Village- Aayagaon, P.S.- Hathua, District- Gopalganj.

¶4

The State of Bihar

¶5

.... .... Petitioner Versus .... .... Opposite Party

¶6

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Irshad Ahmad Khan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 21-08-2017 Heard the parties.

¶8

The petitioner seeks regular bail in Gopalganj P.S. Case No.211 of 2017 for the offence under Section 394 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶9

Allegation against the petitioner is under Section 394 of the I.P.C, though he is not named in the F.I.R. but his name transpires on the basis of spy appointed by the police. He is accused in five other cases.

¶10

Submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner is that he is an employee of B.S.F. and he was on duty. It is further submitted that in all aforesaid cases he has been made accused on only suspicion.

¶11

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39232 of 2017 (2) dt.21-08-2017

¶13

2/2

¶14

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as state above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

¶15

However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude as soon as possible, preferably within nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the trial is not concluded within nine months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

¶16

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

¶17

AnilKrSinha/U T

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Singh @ Amit Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mahendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Osihar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Chanchal Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Tinkori Vs The State Of Bihar

Gautam Kumar @ Gulshan Vs The State Of Bihar