Civil Revision_ Petitioners withdrew petition orally. Court dismissed petition as withdrawn, clarifying withdrawal does not affect case merit.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.88 of 2014
======================================================
1(a). Sunil Kumar, Son of late Sri Kishun Rai. 1(b). Raj Kumar Rai, Son of Late Sri Kishun Rai All R/o Village- Naya Panapur, P.S.- Danapur, P.O.- Manas, Naya Panapur, Dist- Patna.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
Shri Ram Bali Rai Son of Late Shobha Nath Rai Resident of Village - Naya Panapur Diara, P.S.- Danapur, P.O.- Manas Naya Panapur, District - Patna A/P- Ramjichak, P.s.- Digha, District - Patna
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rewti Kant Raman For the Respondent/s :
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
3 21-04-2017 After some argument, learned counsel for the
petitioners seeks permission for withdrawal of this petition.
Accordingly, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is made clear that withdrawal of this petition shall not affect the merit of the case and petitioners may raise their points before the court below at appropriate stage.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
SHAHZAD/-
U
Mostt. Sitabia Devi, Wife of late Sri Kishun Rai
Sunil Kumar, Son of late Sri Kishun Rai
Raj Kumar Rai, Son of Late Sri Kishun Rai
Shri Ram Bali Rai
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
