The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning challenges in the educational department of Bihar. The Court noted that the petitioners' grievances had already been redressed, rendering the present contempt application unnecessary to adjudicate further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5801 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2171 of 2013
======================================================
Patna High Court MJC No.5801 of 2013 (2) dt.26-10-2016
2/3
Anchal Siswan, District Siwan.
Patna High Court MJC No.5801 of 2013 (2) dt.26-10-2016
3/3
(Establishment), Siwan.
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Pd. Yadav, AAG-11 Mr. Dinesh Maharj, AC to AAG-11
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 26-10-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly submits that the grievances of the petitioners have already been redressed. In this view of the matter, the present contempt
application stands disposed of.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application requires adjudication given that the petitioners' grievances were already redressed.
Dhananjay Tiwari and Others
The State Of Bihar
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
