In a contempt application, the single judge held that since the petitioners' grievances were already redressed, the application was disposed of on its own merits without further deliberation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5763 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Sri Bhagwan Singh & Anr. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S. K. Giri, GP-9 |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 26-10-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly |
| submits that the grievances of the petitioners have already been redressed. In this view of the matter, the present contempt application stands disposed of. |
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
U
Sri Bhagwan Singh & Anr.
The State of Bihar & Ors
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
