The Patna High Court dismissed a miscellaneous application in C.R. 125 of 2014 as not pressed due to the absence of the petitioners, despite repeated calls, on the date of the order.
Application dismissed as not pressed due to non-appearance of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3847 of 2016 (3) dt.21-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3847 of 2016
In
C.R. 125 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
3 21-12-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners even after repeated calls.
This application is dismissed as not pressed.
(V. Nath, J)
Ranjan/-
U
Santi Devi wife of Late Din Dayal Thakur
Asha Devi Daughter of Late Din Dayal Thakur
Nirmala Devi Daughter of Late Din Dayal Thakur
Rina Devi Daughter of Late Din Dayal Thakur
Dhananjay Thakur Son of Late Din Dayal Thakur
Kanhaiya Lal Sharma Son of Nagina Sharma
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
