In Second Appeal No.443 of 2012, the Patna High Court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation. The limitation petition filed for condonation of delay was dismissed for default due to non-compliance, rendering the time limit for filing the appeal expired.
The second appeal was dismissed as it fell beyond the limitation period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.443 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus 1. Maheshwari Yadav S/O Late Nirju Yadav R/O Village - Dhamsaina, P.S. Sour Bazar, District - Saharsa
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
10 20-12-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellants.
Perused the office note, from which it transpires that the
Patna High Court SA No.443 of 2012 (10) dt.20-12-2016
2
limitation petition (I.A. No. 1839 of 2013) at flag ‘F’ filed for condonation of delay in filing this appeal has stood dismissed for default for non compliance of the order of this Court.
After dismissal of the limitation petition, this appeal has become barred by limitation and is dismissed as such.
Snkumar/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal is barred by limitation after the condonation of delay petition was dismissed for default.
Bijendra Yadav
Umesh Yadav
Maheshwari Yadav
Suda Devi
Parbhu Yadav
Ram Kumar
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
