Baidyanath Singh and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to have dropped their filing modified by Dated 19.08.1996. The court allowed the prayer subject to liberty to raise grievances.
What did the court decide?
Petition dropped subject to liberty to raise grievances in case legally permissible.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2561 of 1995 (07) dt.10-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2561 of 1995
| ====================================================== Baidyanath Singh & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2643 of 1995 ====================================================== Asheshwar Singh & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : (In MJC No.2561 of 1995) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwa Nath Chaudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh-AC to SC-25 Mr. Prem Kumar Jha Mr. Sujata Mukherjee (In MJC No.2643 of 1995) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwa Nath Chaudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh-AC to SC-25 Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER |
|
| 07 | 10-05-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that |
| the earlier order is found modified vide order dated 19.08.1996, | |
| which is available on the record wherefrom it is apparent that | |
| instead of advisory price, statutory price has been permitted to be given to the Sugar Cane Growers. As per Para-4 of the additional show-cause filed on behalf of Bihar State Sugar Corporation, wherein it has been stated that in terms thereof, the price had |
|
| already been paid, instant proceeding lost its force and be dropped |
Patna High Court MJC No.2561 of 1995 (07) dt.10-05-2016
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Baidyanath Singh & Ors
- respondent
State of Bihar & Ors
Coram
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court