Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2006 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Sona Lal Singh , son of late Gena Singh, Resident of village- Tinkoni, P.S.Darpa, District-East Champaran .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Kailash Singh, son of late Ram Ayodhya Singh 3. Wakil Singh @ Ramesh Singh, son of late Ram Ayodhya Singh 4. Mahesh Singh, son of late Ram Ayodhya Singh 5. Babulesh Kumar, son of Mahesh Singh 6. Pappu Kumar, son of Mahesh Singh All are R/o Vill:- Tinkoni, P.S.-Darpa, District-East Champaran .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 2 09-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Gone through the impugned order. Though, the learned lower court should not have recorded its opinion in such manner, however, the petitioner will have an option available in terms of Section 216 Cr.P.C. to pray before the learned lower court for addition / alteration of charge which, if raised, will have due consideration by the learned lower court.
