Daroga Rai v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition, the Patna High Court dismissed the matter because a regular appointment against the petitioner's post had been made, appearing to satisfy the prior order's direction.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition stands dismissed.
What the court decided
Patna High Court MJC No.206 of 1992 (10) dt.15-03-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.206 of 1992
======================================================
Daroga Rai, son of Late Ramkaul Rai, resident of village Uttampur, P.S. Rajpur, District Bhojpur
.... .... Petitioner Versus
- The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Main Secretariat, Patna
- Shri Phool chand Singh, Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Main Secretariat, Patna
- Shri Achint Kumar Lal, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Engineer-in-Chief, Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Rural Development Department, Nirman Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna .... .... Opp. Parties
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Daroga Rai
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Phool Chand Singh
- respondent
Achint Kumar Lal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court