The High Court disposed of a contempt petition where the petitioner was absent. The court found no cause to continue the present petition and terminated the proceedings.
Contempt petition dismissed on account of non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.160 of 1994
====================================================== Bimal Chandra Sadhya, son of late Biresh Chandra Sadhya, resident of Mohalla Rampur, Patna – 800006 .... .... Petitioner
Versus
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)
4 15-03-2016 The grievance of the petitioner arises out of an order passed by a Division Bench of this Court on 14.12.1993 in CWJC No. 12077 of 1993 wherein an interim order was passed that no coercive step shall be taken by the Collector with respect to realization of dues from the personal properties of the Director of the Company.
CWJC No. 12077 of 1993 has since been decided on 29th of April, 2010. Therefore, the interim order passed on 14.12.1993 stand merged in the main order.
We do not find any cause to continue with the present petition, moreover, when none is present on behalf of the petitioner.
The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Hemant Gupta, J)
S.Pandey/-
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
U
Bimal Chandra Sadhya
The State of Bihar
Sri Arvind Kumar Chug
Sri Ram Swaroop Das
Sri S.Verma
Hemant Gupta
Ramesh Kumar Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
