Single judge restored a writ petition to its original status, leading to the allowance of the current miscellaneous application.
C.W.J.C. no. 19455 of 2012 restored to its original status; M.J.C. 1912 of 2016 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1912 of 2016 ====================================================== Most.raj Kumari Devi .... .... Petitioner Versus Narendra Prasad Rai & Ors. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER |
|
| 3 1 |
4-09-2016 Considering the submissions made on behalf of |
| petitioner, C.W.J.C. no. 19455 of 2012 is directed to be restored to | |
| its original status. | |
| Consequent thereupon, M.J.C. 1912 of 2016 is | |
| allowed. | |
| rinkee/- U |
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) |
Most.raj Kumari Devi
Narendra Prasad Rai & Ors.
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
