This order dismissed a writ petition as infructuous since the trial concluded in the courts below resulted in the acquittal of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49601 of 2015
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2013 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR District- PATNA | |
|---|---|
| ====================================================== | |
| 1. Ram Ettar Yadav @ Ram Etter Mahto, Son of Deonandan Yadav (Mahto) 2. Rakesh Kumar, Son of Ram Ettar Yadav @ Ram Ettar Mahto, both residents of village - Moghalpura, P.S. - Bakhteyarpur, District - Patna. |
|
| .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pradip Narayan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER |
|
| 9 1 |
4-09-2016 Seen the report submitted by the learned Lower Court so communicated vide letter no. 796/2016 dt. 27.08.2016. After perusal of the same, it is apparent that trial had already been concluded resulting in acquittal of the petitioners. That being so, the instant petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. |
| (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) | |
| rinkee/- U |
T |
Ram Ettar Yadav @ Ram Etter Mahto
Rakesh Kumar
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
