Petitioner sought restoration of CWJC No.20210 of 2011, dismissed for non-prosecution. Court allowed restoration based on prior reasons and disposed of the miscellaneous jurisdiction case.
Prayer for restoration of CWJC No.20210 of 2011 is allowed and the case is restored to the original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1291 of 2016 (3) dt.28-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1291 of 2016
=================================================== Gaya Prasad Diwakar, son of Late Halkhori Thakur, resident of Moh. South Chokkar Maidan, Muzaffarpur, P.S. Muzaffarpur, Mufassil, District Muzaffarpur.
1.
2.
3.
4.
.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Nirman Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
.... .... Respondents =================================================== Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. Uma Shankar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondents : =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
prayer for restoration is allowed and CWJC No. 20210 of 2011 is restored to its original file. 4. M.J.C. No. 1291 of 2016 stands disposed of.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/BT
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for restoration of CWJC No.20210 of 2011 should be allowed.
Gaya Prasad Diwakar
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department
The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department
The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department
The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department
The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Division No.2
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
