Allowed

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Aug 2016CR. MISC./30543/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30543 of 2016 involved a bail petition by four petitioners, sons of the first petitioner, who had been denied anticipatory bail. This order granted bail to petitioners 2 to 4, directing them to surrender within six weeks and furnish bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to petitioners 2 to 4 upon their surrender within six weeks, subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each and two sureties of like amount.

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.30543 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jai Lal Yadav @ Jai Lal Rai son of Late Suraj Rai (Deleted vide order dated 25.07.2016

¶5

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Rai son of Jai Lal Yadav @ Jai Lal Rai.

¶6

Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Yadav @ Dilip son of Jai Lal Yadav @ Jai Lal Rai

¶7

Krishna Yadav son of Jai Lal Yadav @ Jai Lal Rai.

¶8

All Residents of Village- Shankar Saraiya (Ahir Toli), Police StationTurkauliya, District- East Champaran.

¶9

.... .... Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Bihar

¶12

.... .... Opposite Party

¶13

====================================================== Appearance :

¶14

For the Petitioners : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶16

4 24-08-2016 By order dated 25.07.2016, the anticipatory bail petition on behalf of the petitioner no. 1 Jai Lal Yadav @ Jai Lal Rai stood dismissed as it has become infructuous.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 2 to 4 and learned APP for the State.

¶18

Petitioner nos. 2 to 4 apprehend their arrest for the

¶19

offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016.

¶20

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and there is a case and counter case between the

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30543 of 2016 (4) dt.24-08-2016

¶22

2/2

¶23

parties and they are agnates of each other. The injury attributed to the assault by Jailal Yadav and Manoj Yadav is belied from the injury report of the informant showing the cause of injury with hard and blunt substance which is simple in nature.

¶24

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioner nos. 2 to 4’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶26

Md. Ibrarul/BT

¶27

U T

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Rai and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Kumar Das @ Rohit Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Jai Prakash @ Baba Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Singh @ Papu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Gaya Prasad Diwakar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Samsin Bin Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Shamim @ Shamim Vs The State Of Bihar